Quantum computing exploits phenomena like superposition and entanglement, letting a quantum computer evaluate many possibilities in parallel rather than testing them one by one as a classical computer does. This parallelism is what could eventually make certain mathematical problems, including the ones underpinning modern cryptography, solvable in a fraction of the time they take today.
The specific risk to blockchain networks comes from Shor's algorithm, which can theoretically derive a private key from its corresponding public key on elliptic-curve systems like ECDSA, the signature scheme used by Bitcoin and most other chains. Hash functions used for mining and address generation are considered far more resistant, needing only larger output sizes to stay safe, so the immediate concern is signatures and exposed public keys, not the underlying blockchain ledger itself.
No existing quantum computer comes close to the millions of stable, error-corrected qubits such an attack would require; current machines remain small and error-prone. Research in 2026 narrowed the theoretical resource gap, keeping the topic active, but experts still describe a practical break as years away.
In response, standards bodies have finalized lattice- and hash-based post-quantum algorithms, and developers are drafting quantum-resistant address formats and migration plans so networks can adopt new signature schemes before the threat becomes real, rather than after.